THE PRODUCT

From something’s broken to here’s the fix.

Command captures in-app feedback, scopes issues for your coding agents, and replies to reporters after your team reviews and ships the fix.

Start free →

Step through it.

01 / 04

One sentence in.

She types what went wrong in her own words, right where she found it. No login, no ticket form, no waiting on hold.

1
SENTENCE NEEDED
0
ACCOUNTS REQUIRED
app.acme.co/billing/exports
YOUR APP
Export CSV

Something went wrong. Try again.

THIRD ATTEMPT · 09:40:58

Command

What should change?

Plain words are fine. We’ll take care of the technical part.

the export button doesn’t work
BugIdeaConfusing

Attached automatically
This page, the error, and your last few clicks.

⌘ .Send
FOR YOUR USERS

Six plain words for her. Everything for you.

WHAT NADIA EVER SEES
  • Copy that. Your report is filed.
  • One question: which browser?
  • Accepted. It’s queued to be fixed.
  • Fixed — it shipped this morning.
AND THREE WAYS TO OPEN IT
  • The mark, docked on the edge
  • ⌘.Keyboard, zero pixels
  • open()Your own button, anywhere

No floating bubble. Ever.

Four messages, no login, no ticket number, no email chain. The thread stays in the app where she found the problem.

WHAT YOUR TEAM GETS

TypeError @ exports.ts:141

POST /api/exports → 500 ×3

STRAIGHT ANSWERS

It says the hard things too.

A system that can’t say no just goes quiet instead. These are real replies, at the same size as the good news, with no cushion words.

NEVER: “YOUR FEEDBACK IS VALUABLE” · “WE’RE LOOKING INTO IT”

DAY 2

We tried 40 times and couldn’t make it happen. The report stays open.

Plus a button: it happened again — recording next time.

DAY 1

We’re not building this. The sidebar is being replaced in autumn.

A real reason and a date. Disagree and it goes back to whoever decided.

SAME DAY

Four others asked for this. You’re on their thread now.

Her wording is kept on the thread, not replaced by ours.

4 MIN

You’re right and we were wrong. Reopened, back at the top.

Sent four minutes after she replied “it’s still doing it”. No apology template.

THE SCREEN THAT HOLDS YOU TO IT

Anything accepted and then left quiet shows up here.

Promising to fix something and then going silent is the failure this product exists to prevent — so Command counts it, names it, and ages it in public until somebody says something true.

0
LEFT SILENT THIS WEEK
14d
MAX AGE BEFORE ESCALATION

Needs you

3 AGEING
SOFIA
  • the report builder loses my filters

    R-2091 · AMIR · ACCEPTED 9 DAYS AGO · SILENT 9 DAYS

    We said we’d fix this and then said nothing. Amir has opened the widget four times since.

    Tell him where it standsDefer honestly
  • login copy reads wrong in German

    R-2111 · WE ASKED LARS A QUESTION · 5h AGO

    Waiting on him, not on us. No action needed.

  • export takes 40 seconds

    R-2062 · DEFERRED · CHECK-IN DUE IN 5 DAYS

    Deferred with a date. The date is what makes it honest.

It works where you already work.

Nothing to migrate. Command writes into the tools your team already opens.

COORDINATE
LinearGitHub
WRITE THE FIX
CodexCursorClaude Codeopencode
CHECK IT
CodeRabbitYour CIYour reviewers

Questions people ask.

TAP TO OPEN

No. They open a pull request on a branch, and your normal review and CI decide what merges. You can also run Command with no agents at all — it still receives, scopes and answers.

Stop losing what your users were trying to tell you.

ONE SCRIPT TAG · 4 MINUTES